Rafael Jodar vs Ji Sung Nam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Aug at 09:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Jodar vs J. Sung Nam

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jodar 1 - 0 Nam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rafael Jodar winning 2 and Ji Sung Nam winning 0. The last match between Rafael Jodar and Ji Sung Nam was at the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger, 03-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Rafael Jodar getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Jodar | 1 |
Nam | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger(08-03-25)
R. Jodar vs J. S. Nam H2H Profile
R. Jodar vs J. S. Nam Match Preview:
- How does Nam perform on their second serve? Nam has won 37.86% of points on their second serve over the past six months.
- In contrast, Jodar shows a stronger performance on second serves, winning 46.29% of points.
- Nam has been more successful with returning second serves, winning 48.1% of their opponents' points.
- Jodar's return game on second serves is slightly less effective, with 44.31% of points won.
- When returning first serves, Nam edges out Jodar with a 32.04% success rate compared to Jodar's 27.46%.
- Nam saves 51.05% of breakpoints under pressure. How does Jodar compare? Jodar outperforms slightly, saving 53.42% of breakpoints.
- Over the past year, Nam has a match win rate of 57.89%, while Jodar holds a slightly better rate of 58.82%.
- Nam excels on Hard courts, with a 58% career win rate, but struggles on Grass, winning only 33% of matches.
- Conversely, Jodar's best surface is Clay with a 56% win rate, yet they have a lower performance on Hard courts with a 53% win rate.
- Nam mainly competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of these matches.
- In contrast, Jodar participates in higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of their matches.
- Nam faces opponents with an average ranking of 403.63, whereas Jodar competes against higher-ranked players with an average rank of 258.24.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Jodar seems more likely to come out on top, with a 70% win rate in such situations compared to Nam's 58%.
- Nam is more efficient in break point conversion, completing 44.19% of chances, while Jodar converts 38.89%.
Editorial Prediction (August 3, 2025, UTC):
Based on the analysis, Jodar seems to have a slight edge over Nam in several key areas. Jodar's superior performance on second serve points and a slightly better breakpoint saving ability gives them a competitive advantage.
Although Nam has shown strong return stats and a better breakpoint conversion rate, Jodar's experience against higher-ranked opponents and success rate in deciding sets could play a crucial role.
Taking into account the higher level of competition Jodar regularly faces and their ability to perform in pressure situations, Jodar seems well-positioned for a potential victory in their next match against Nam.
Rafael Jodar vs Ji Sung Nam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Jodar vs J. S. Nam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 3 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:5:55 | Average Match Time | 1:5:55 |
59% (29/49) | 1st Serve % | 50% (26/52) |
79% (23/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (16/26) |
60% (12/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (10/26) |
67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
50% (26/52) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Jodar Recent Matches Played
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played

R. Jodar vs J. S. Nam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65.52% (38/20) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.27% (305/237) |
60.90% (81/52) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.75% (684/543) |
54.52% (670/559) | Games Win/Loss | 52.30% (5944/5421) |
68.57% (24/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.95% (255/185) |
55.56% (10/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (28/28) |
80.00% (4/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.84% (21/22) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
150 | Aces Total | 1018 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
131 | Total Double Faults | 959 |
1:38:45 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
332.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 581.31 |
59% (2162/3660) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14218/21863) |
69% (1488/2162) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (9590/14218) |
52% (784/1498) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3729/7645) |
44% (191/437) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1145/2597) |
43% (1586/3716) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9823/22973) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
68.18% (30/14) | Challenger W/L | 49.53% (106/108) |
57.14% (8/6) | Futures W/L | 61.71% (195/121) |
66% (38/58) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (295/526) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
40% (4/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (75/140) |
71% (12/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (72/152) |
92% (36/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (303/260) |
8% (36/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (303/42) |
23% (22/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (238/45) |